Came across this https://ferenc.andrasek.hu/papersybprx/Stephen_Yablo_circularity_and_paradox.pdf
which gave me the hint that if we are seeing a paradox, either a semantic one or a set-theoretic one, the problem lies in our language. Apparently if we describe it in a better language the paradox disappears, i.e. the confusion/fudge factor clears up.
Also, this led to some exploration into how people view Category Theory https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2522116/is-category-theory-more-abstract-than-set-theory-or-proof-theory and this was a good example.
Apparently, this took me to a page ive looked at previously - which is this diagram. which seems to be an attempt by people to seek a theory of truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment